Saturday, June 6, 2015

RAM JANM BHUMI-TEMPLE

. RAM JANM BHUMI-TEMPLE-राम जन्म भूमि मन्दिर निर्माण 
CONCEPTS & EXTRACTS IN HINDUISM By :: Pt. Santosh  Bhardwaj 
dharmvidya.wordpress.com  hindutv.wordpress.com santoshhastrekhashastr.wordpress.com    
santoshkipathshala.blogspot.com     santoshsuvichar.blogspot.com    santoshkathasagar.blogspot.com   bhartiyshiksha.blogspot.com bhagwatkathamrat.wordpress.com    
Let the honourable Supreme Court of India take note of the following text. 
तुलसी दास जी ने जो कि अकबर के समकालीन थे और जिन्हें अकबर ने चमत्कार दिखाने के लिये कैद कर लिया था ने, दोहा  शतक में बाबरी मस्जिद का उल्लेख किया है। अकबर की जेल पर अचानक बन्दरों ने हमला कर दिया था और उन्हें छुड़ाकर ले गये थे। 
वामपंथी विचारको तथा इतिहासकारों गुमराह लोगों का कहना है कि तुलसी दास ने राम चरित मानस में बाबरी मस्जिद का कही जिक्र नही किया। तुलसी के दोहा शतक को अर्थ सहित इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट में प्रमाण स्वरूप प्रस्तुत किया था। 
मन्त्र उपनिषद ब्राह्मनहुँ बहु पुरान इतिहास। जवन जराये रोष भरि करि तुलसी परिहास॥
क्रोध से ओतप्रोत यवनों ने बहुत सारे मन्त्र (संहिता), उपनिषद, ब्राह्मणग्रन्थों (जो वेद के अंग होते हैं) तथा पुराण व इतिहास सम्बन्धी  ग्रन्थों का उपहास करते हुये उन्हें जला दिया।
सिखा सूत्र से हीन करि बल ते हिन्दू लोग। भमरि भगाये देश ते तुलसी कठिन कुजोग॥
बलपूर्वक हिंदुओं को यग्योपवीत, शिखा-चोटी और गृहविहीन कर अपने पैतृक देश से भगा दिया।
बाबर बर्बर आइके कर लीन्हे करवाल। हने पचारि पचारि जन  तुलसी काल कराल॥
हाथ में तलवार लिये हुये बर्बर बाबर आया और लोगों को ललकार-ललकार कर हत्या की। यह समय बहुत कठिन था।
सम्बत सर वसु बान नभ ग्रीष्म ऋतु अनुमानि। तुलसी अवधहिं जड़ जवन अनरथ किये अनखानि
उस समय में ज्योतिषी काल गणना में अंक दायें से बाईं ओर लिखे जाते थे,  सर (शर) = 5, वसु = 8, बान (बाण) = 5, नभ = 1 
अर्थात विक्रम सम्वत 1585 और विक्रम सम्वत में से 57 वर्ष घटा देने से ईस्वी सन 1528 आता है।
सम्वत् 1585 विक्रमी (सन 1528 ई) अनुमानतः ग्रीष्मकाल में जड़ यवनों ने अवध में अवर्णनीय अनर्थ किये।
राम जनम महि मंदरहिं, तोरि मसीत बनाय। जवहिं बहुत हिन्दू हते, तुलसी किन्ही हाय॥
रामजन्मभूमि का मन्दिर नष्ट करके, उन्होंने एक मस्जिद बनाई। साथ ही उन्होंने बहुत से हिंदुओं की हत्या की।इसे सोचकर तुलसीदास अत्यंत दुखी हुये।
दल्यो मीरबाकी अवध मन्दिर रामसमाज।  तुलसी रोवत ह्रदय हति त्राहि त्राहि रघुराज॥
मीरबाकी ने मन्दिर तथा रामसमाज (राम दरबार की मूर्तियों) को नष्ट किया। राम से रक्षा की याचना करते हुए विदिर्ण ह्रदय तुलसी रोये।
राम जनम मन्दिर जहाँ तसत अवध के बीच। तुलसी रची मसीत तहँ मीरबाकी खल नीच॥
अयोध्या के बीच जहाँ राममन्दिर था, वहाँ नीच मीर बाकी ने मस्जिद बनाई।
रामायन घरि घट जँह,श्रुति पुरान उपखान। तुलसी जवन अजान तँह कइयों कुरान अज़ान॥
जहाँ रामायण, श्रुति, वेद, पुराण से सम्बंधित प्रवचन होते थे। घण्टे, घड़ियाल बजते थे, वहाँ यवनों की कुरआन और अज़ान होने लगे।
इससे यह स्पष्ट है कि गोस्वामी तुलसी दास जी की इस रचना में राम जन्म भूमि विध्वंस का विस्तृत रूप से वर्णन किया गया है।[10.08.2017]
Those Muslims who are aware that they are the sons of the soil and their ancestors were Hindus, would never oppose the construction of the RAM TEMPLE, whether its a matter of faith or history. Most of the Muslims who are opposing this, are derived by the desire to gain money or political mileage. Most of the Muslims in India are illiterate, uneducated, misguided or be fooled by the so called care takers of Islam. India was divided on the basis of religion and any one who opposes the construction of the temple is free to migrate to an Islamic country of his choice, specially Pakistan which is virtually a hell, where might is right and right is not right.
As far as the incarnation of Bhagwan Ram is concerned it took place more than 17,50,000 years ago, while Islam is just a baby, born 1500 years ago. Islam is not a religion-faith of India and has no place here. Muslims were intruders, decoits, invaders, barbarians and there is no place for it in a civilised society, all over the world.
The Supreme Court can base its verdict over the laws in force now, but what about the loot, unlawful possession of property that took place more than 400 years ago?! More than 3,500 temples are under seize in India, what about them and unlawful occupation?![24.03,2017]



Image result for Images ram janam bhumi templeIndia got freedom from the clutches of the Britishers but is still under seize of Muslim traitors, who came to India headed by Babar. Krashn Janm Bhumi, Ram Janm Bhumi and the Kashi Vishw Nath temple are still under the seize-control of Muslim-invaders-traitors-barbarians. The so called secular governments allowed the Muslims to stay in India and discrete the Hindu places of worship. More than 3500 temples are under seize, which need liberation. After the partition of India on the basis of religion, Muslims have no moral right to stay in India. Even the land occupied by them in Pakistan & Bangla Desh deserve to be freed. Kashmir is the land of Mahrishi Kashyap discreted by Muslims and deserve to be freed from their dominion (-प्रभुत्व, अधिराज्य, उपनिवेश, domination, ascendancy, scepter, supremacy, colony, settlement, dominion, dependency). Gandhi & Nehru showed undue sympathy towards them and allowed millions of Hindus butchered by them. 18 crore Muslims are liability over the Hindus. They create all sort of nuisance-non sense, time and again and do not allow Hindus to worship freely, at the places owned by them, ancestrally. Vote politics permits those sitting in legislature house-having multiple criminal cases pending against them, to support Muslims for the sack of votes. Congress & the descendants of Nehru family-observing-following multiple religious practices like Christianity and Islam, too support them. Today's Hindu is a divide lot and is a puppet in the hands crazy-selfish politicians. The BJP remembers Ram Temple only when the elections are due-approaching.
Image result for bhagwan ramThe Kazi of Faiza Bad during the reign of Babar discreted the Ram temple at Ayodhya and allowed a Mosque to be built there called Babri Masjid with the money (Rs.600) which Babar sent to be handed over to the Brahmn who offered water, roasted gram (-भुने हुए चने), Sattu (-सत्तू, powder of parched gram & barley) & Gur (-jaggery, molasses, treacle, गुड़, खांड़, शीरा, जूसी, राब, सीरा) to tired, hungry and thirsty Babar. He took care of his horse as well. The money never reached the deserving Brahmn.

The Ayodhya temple was razed by the Muslims in 1528. Ayodhya is the birthplace of Bhagwan Ram, which was ruled by mighty king Dashrath, who had helped the demigods against the demons. Bhagwan Ram was an incarnation, of Bhagwan Vishnu. Ayodhya is one of seven sacred sites where Moksh-final release from the cycles of death and rebirth, may be obtained.
Babar invaded north India from Kabul with 1200 soldiers in 1525. Now there are 19 crore Muslims residing in India, but most of them are Sunni-Indian converts to Islam and he was a Shia. He first defeated Ibrahim Lodhi at the first battle of Panipat and then the Rajput King of Chittor Garh, Rana Sangram Singh, at Khanwa. After these triumphs, Babar took over a substantial part of northern India.
One of his generals, Mir Baqi came to Ayodhya in 1528 with the money to be handed over to the Brahmn who served Babar without knowing his credentials. The temple was then destroyed by the Kazi-governor at Faiza Bad. A mosque was built with the money called masjid-i-janm sthan (mosque at the birthplace) as well as Babri Masjid (-Babar's mosque).The Babri Mosque was one of the largest mosques in Uttar Pradesh, a state in India with considerable Muslim population. Both the Hindus and Muslims are said to have worshiped at the mosque-temple, Muslims inside the mosque and Hindus outside the mosque but inside the compound. After the British took over the State, they put up a railing between the two areas to prevent disputes.
Nisha Dwivedi's photo.
The Ayodhya dispute (-अयोध्या विवाद) has political, historical and socio-religious dimensions.  It is centered over a plot of land in the city of Ayodhya, located in Faiza Bad district, Uttar Pradesh. The main issues revolve around access to a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of Bhagwan Ram an incarnation of Bhagwan Vishnu, who descended over the earth some 17,50,000 years ago in Treta Yug. The so called British historians wrote ill history on the strength of imagination without going through the scriptures, being unable to understand Sanskrat. Modern historians did not care to go through the documents available with thousands of priests coming down through ages from one generation to another. There were several visible evidences at the site to show that there stood a magnificent temple demolished by the bigot Kazi. Still history can be recreated connecting threads-documents bit by bit. 
The Babri Mosque was so old, dilapidated, mutilated structure, which just needed a jerk-earth quake of high intensity to be destroyed and turned into rubble. The Central government sent the army columns to Ayodhya but stationed them at a distance 40 km from the site. It was a well planned exercise-conspiracy to put the blame on others. Shri Lal Krashn Adwani was by video graphed stating that Kar Sewaks-volunteers, would have to walk over his dead body, if they tried to destroy the structure. Sindhiya was present at the site and the video was telecast by the foreign media. It was a well planned exercise to block the ever rising influence over the masses. In fact he too wanted the temple to be built at the site, being a place of worship of Sanatan Dharm for millions of years. The blame was put on the innocent Hindus for scoring political mileage, successfully. Had the matter been investigated properly, it would have surfaced that those who harmed the structure were none other than congress governments agents. In fact the ruling party had gained notoriety in creating communal violence in the country by then. It had engineered thousands of riots earlier. More than 73 innocent Hindus were burnt alive in a railway coach. Riots were arranged in Gujrat and the blame was passed on to the CM who was gaining popularity due to his hard-devoted work. Later it was planned to eliminate him. The terrorists were willfully protected by central government and the IB officials were implicated.
A land title case was lodged in the Allahabad High Court, the verdict of which was pronounced on 30 September 2010. In the landmark hearing, the three judges bench of The Allahabad High Court ruled that the 2.77 acres (1.12 ha) of Ayodhya land be divided into 3 parts, with 1/3 going to the Ram Lalla or Infant Ram represented by the Hindu Maha Sabha for the construction of the Ram temple, 1/3 going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board and the remaining 1/3 going to a Hindu religious denomination Nirmohi Akhara. While the three-judge bench was not unanimous that the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of a temple, it did agree that a temple or a temple structure predated the mosque at the same site. The excavations by the Archaeological Survey of India were heavily used as evidence by the court that the predating structure was a massive Hindu religious building. Its unfortunate that the traitors are pleading the ownership of the piece of land which was forcibly snatched by the invaders. This place has deep rooted sentimental attachment of the Hindus. In fact treachery and notoriety is involved in the whole episode. The lawyers who pleaded the case in the court have mansions-bungalows and the deity is still residing  under the tarpaulin (-तिरपाल-make shift site).
Bhagwan Ram's son Kush ruled it for more 10,000 years. [Please refer to Sury Vansh over bhartiyshiksha.blogspot.com] It became a pilgrimage site for more than 17,50,000 years for the Hindus. It had close connections with Russia since Kaikai the favorite queen of Maha Raj Dashrath was from Russia. She was a great charioteer and warrior. It had good connections with Vietnam since one of the princess from Ayodhya was married to the royal family of Vietnam. During the period of Mahatma Buddh Kaushal-Ayodhya (600 B.C.) was called Saket and it was one of the 6 largest cities of North India. During the Gupt regime, Kumar Gupt & Skand Gupt made it their capital and it was again referred to as Ayodhya. Kali Das wrote Raghu Vansh here and referred to Guptar Tirth (Guptar Ghat), where Ram was believed to have entered the waters of Saryu in his ascent to Vaikunth Lok, his abode as Bhagwan Vishnu. Millions of devotees gathered here for millions of years to pay obeisance-respect to the God. Vikram Dity patronized it. Prabhavati Gupt, the daughter of Chandr Gupta II, was a devotee of Bhagwan Shri Ram. Her son, Pravar Sen (II) wrote Setu Bandh, in which Bhagwan Shri Ram is regarded as identical to Bhagwan Shri Hari Vishnu. He also built a temple to Ram at Pravar Pur (-प्रवर पुर, पौनार, Paunar near Ramtek) around 450 A.D.
GAHADWAL DYNASTY :: After the Gupt period,  Kannauj gained prominence. Ayodhya was brought under the reign of the Gahadwals, 11th century A.D. The Gahadwals were Vaeshnav. They built several Vishnu temples in Ayodhya, five of which survived till the end of Aurangzeb's reign. As a matter of fact no building can survive the slaughter of the changing weather and it starts depletion-erosion soon after building-erection in the absence of regular maintenance. Even in the present reference when excellent material is used the normal life of a Pucca building varies from 70 to 100 years. Almost all temples and old forts tell this story. Dynasty after dynasty, generation after generation the temples had been refurbished (-जीर्णोद्धार, restoration, repair, renovation, rebuilding). Old stones clearly tell their story. Sufficient proof-evidences are still available to confirm the presence of Bhagwan Ram temples all around Ayodhya, what to talk of Ram Janm Bhumi. The claim by Muslims does not stand ground. It is one of the 7 Puries-the divine Pilgrimage sites and will remain even if the so called myopic secular governments do their best to discreet the site like Aurangzeb or Babar did. Mahatamy-significance of Ayodhya does not need a certificate by a court or the government, being a matter of faith. A long period of time 17,50,000 years led to continuous deposition of layer after layer of silt and the dust falling continuously from the sky. The actual site remain buried under the soil. Sooner or later excavations will certainly bring out the city buried beneath. Even after the discretion & erection of a mosque the place continued to be called Ram Durg or Ram Kot (-the fort of Ram). The invaders-traitors changed the names of cities with those suitable to them.Their dirty games and tricks are still on.
Tulsidas, who began writing the Ram Charit Manas in Ayodhya on Bhagwan Ram's birthday in 1574 (coming there from his normal residence in Varanasi) mentioned the great birthday festival in Ayodhya but made no mention of a mosque at Rama's birthplace.  Abul-Fazl ibn Mubarak, who wrote Akbar Nama, completing the third volume Ain-i Akbari in 1598, described Ram Navmi (-राम नवमीं- नौमी)-the birthday festival in Ayodhya, the residence of Ram and the holiest place of antiquity, but made no mention of a mosque. William Finch, the English traveller who visited Ayodhya around 1611 and wrote about the ruins of the Rani Chand [Ram Chand] castle and houses, where Hindus believed the great God took flesh upon him to see the tamasha of the world. He found pandas-Brahmn priests, in the ruins of the fort, who were recording the names of the pilgrims, a practice that was said to go back to antiquity.
Sufficient and irrefutable evidence is available to illustrate that thousands of mosques were built by demolishing the temples of the idolatrous (-idol-worshiping, icon-worshiping, extreme admiration or reverence for Almighty) Hindus situated at Mathura, Banaras-Kashi-Varanasi, Awadh etc. There is no mention of Babar ever having constructed  Mosque in Ayodhya. The Ayodhya Mosque had been juxtaposed (-to place different things together in order to create an interesting effect)  to show how they are the same or different with those built by Aurangzeb at Mathura and Banaras. The material used in the said Mosque does not resemble the material used for building a Mosque in Babar era. Babar-a brute & barbarian, was never keen to construct any typical building. He was deeply involved in warfare throughout his life leaving no time for activities like construction which is possible during peaceful times only. Its claimed that Taj Mahal was built by Sah Jahan a few years later. The two buildings were millions times different from one another. Sah Jahan too was involved in more than 65 wars during his life time. If one compares these two structures with Bibi ka Makbara at Auranga Bad whole game becomes clear. Hence one can easily conclude that the claims are motivated. The design & architect too do not resemble with one which was employed in Kabul or Afghanistan during that era. Still, it is certain that the entire region in and around Afghanistan was a Hindu dominion with culture, virtues & values which were prevalent before the on set of Buddhism. 
Jai Singh (II) Sawai Jai Singh, (1688-1743) purchased land and established Jai Singh Pura in all Hindu religious centers in North India, including Mathura, Vrandavan, Banaras, Allahabad, Ujjain and Ayodhya. The documents of these activities have been preserved in the Kapad-Dwar collection in the City Palace Museum in Jaipur. Jai Singh had acquired the land of Ram Janm Sthan in 1717. The ownership of the land was vested in the deity. The hereditary title of the ownership was recognized and enforced by the Mughal State from 1717. He also found a letter from a Gumasta Trilok Chand, dated 1723, stating that, while under the Muslim administration people had been prevented from taking a ritual bath in the Saryu river, the establishment of the Jai Singh Pura had removed all impediments.
Jesuit priest Joseph Tieffenthaler who visited Awadh in 1766-1771, recorded Hindus worshiping and celebrating Ram Navmi at the site of the Mosque. In 1788, Tieffenthaler's French works were published in Paris, the first to suggest that the Babri Mosque was on the birthplace of Ram, saying that "Emperor Aurangzeb got demolished the fortress called Ram Kot and erected on the same place a Mahometan temple with three cupolas-triple domes. Fourteen black stone pillars of 5 span high, which had existed at the site of the fortress, are seen there. Twelve of these pillars now support the interior arcades of the mosque. It was reclaimed by Hindus through numerous wars after the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 A.D. Hindus had earlier fortified it during Jahangir's rule as Ram Kot. This ambiguity between Aurangzeb and Babar is significant. Tieffenthaler also wrote that Hindus worshiped a square box raised 5 inches above the ground, which was said to be called the "Bedi, i.e., the cradle." "The reason for this is that once upon a time, here was a house where Beschan [Vishnu] was born in the form of Ram." Ram's birthday was said to be celebrated every year, with a big gathering of people, which was "so famous in the entire India." Now, one can conclude safely that the Mosque was built the Kazi during the rein of Babar which gave away to time and natures impact. Purchase of Land by Jai Singh, building of temple by him, demolition of it by the bigot Aurangzeb and the construction of Mosque described by Tieffenthaler form a sequence.
In 1858, the Muazzin of the Babri Mosque said in a petition to the British government that the courtyard had been used by Hindus for hundreds of years. The existence of Muslims in India is barely few hundred years.
The British recognized the religious and political tension between the Muslims and Hindus. An early census, taken in 1869, found the Hindu people to comprise 66.4 percent of the total population in Ayodhya and a little over 60 percent in nearby Faizabad. The British contended that the Ayodhya area was primarily Hindu, not in regards to this census, but to the chief spiritual significance for the birthplace of Ram.The first recorded instances of religious violence in Ayodhya occurred in the 1850's over a nearby Mosque at Hanuman Garhi. 
The Babri mosque was attacked by Hindus in the process. Since then, local Hindu groups have made occasional demands that they should have the possession of the site and that they should be allowed to build a temple on the site, all of which were denied by the colonial government. In 1946, an offshoot of the Hindu Maha Sabha called Akhil Bhartiy Ramayan Maha Sabha started an agitation for the possession of the site. In 1949, Sant Digvijay Nath of Gorakh Nath Math joined the Akhil Bhartiy Ramayan Maha Sabha and organised a 9-day continuous recitation of Ram Charit Manas, at the end of which the Hindu nationalists broke into the Mosque & worshiped the deity Bhagwan Shri Ram, there.
Jawahar Lal Nehru insisted that the idols should be removed. However, the local official K. K. K. Nair, known for his Hindu nationalist connections, refused to carry out orders claiming that it would lead to communal riots. The police locked the gates so that the public (Hindus as well as Muslims) could not enter. However, the idols remained inside and priests were allowed entry to perform daily worship. So, the Mosque had been converted into a de facto temple. Both the Sunni Wakf Board and the Akhil Bhartiy Ramayan Maha Sabha filed civil suits staking their respective claims to the site. The land was declared to be under dispute and the gates remained locked. This clearly shows Nehru's bent of mind and the support he received from Gandhi, who was always sympathetic to Muslims. All the properties under the control of Wakf board belonged to temples.
Gorakh Nath wing of Hindu nationalism the other saffron, has maintained its existence separately from the mainstream Hindu nationalism of the Sangh Parivar. After the Vishw Hindu Parishad was formed in 1964 and started agitating for the Babri Masjid site, the two strands of saffron politics came together. The district magistrate K. K. K. Nair, who refused to carry out orders, was eventually dismissed, but he became a local hero and subsequently a politician of the Bhartiy Jan Sangh. Nehru's daughter married a Muslim. She went to Kabul to pay obeisances to Babar and was heard saying his family was still ruling India.
RECLAIMING BHAGWAN SHRI RAM'S BIRTH PLACE :: In the 1980's, the Vishw Hindu Parishad (VHP), belonging to the mainstream Hindu nationalist family Sangh Parivar, launched a new movement to reclaim the site for Hindus and to erect a temple dedicated to the Ram Lala, infant Bhagwan Shri Ram at this spot. The Bhartiy Janta Party (BJP), formed in 1980 from the remnants of the Jan Sangh, became the political face of the campaign. In 1986, a district judge ruled that the gates would be reopened and Hindus permitted to worship inside, providing a major boost to the movement. In September 1990, BJP leader Hon. Shri Lal Krashn  Advani began a Rath Yatra-Chariot pulling (-an ancient pilgrimage procession) to Ayodhya in order to generate support for the movement. He stated that if Muslims are entitled to an Islamic atmosphere in Mecca and if Christians are entitled to a Christian atmosphere in the Vatican, why is it wrong for the Hindus to expect a Hindu atmosphere in Ayodhya ? The ruling parties at the center & Bihar instigated Muslims to begin communal riots-violence & Lalu played the mischief by arresting Adwani Ji. But it back fired and BJP gained sympathy throughout India. People from all over the country started sending truck loads of bricks to Ayodhya having RAM inscribed over them and those who never heard of RSS, VHP and the BJP were enlightened. It was the beginning of renascence (-पुनर्जागरण) in India, having suffered at the hands of Britishers and the Muslims, equally. The Britishers had more sinister designs pertaining to India. The wrote factually incorrect history of India calling Aryans intruders. The stupid fellow never knew the existence of India for such a long time immemorial that they would forget counting there after. Even the worlds fastest computer may fail to reach the real life of India and Hindu civilization. Its not their fault since they do not not that their own roots are still present in India. 
The momentum did not stop. Dedicated workers-volunteers-Kar-Sewaks from all walks of life, Varn, castes proceeded to Ayodhya and the inevitable happened, in-spite of Advani and Sindhiya's efforts to stop the depleted structure from being come down. A clip said to have been telecast by BBC, showed the clash between Adwani, Raj Mata Sindhia of Gwalior and the goons sent to Ayodhya by the opposition parties. All sorts of falls hood was spread willfully, intentionally through media: Press, radio, Television, internet and word of mouth and again it misfired. Here the main question is, "why and how the pious and disciplined Hindu got agitated? Was there a deep rooted conspiracy to defame BJP?" Central and the UP government became helpless in front of such a large leaderless crowd infiltrated by the antisocial elements, who had a hay day. Perhaps the goons too wanted to do that. The fact remains that the crowd had goons posted by the opposition parties, who had and are still playing the politics of secularism. This was drama sequence, to win the Muslims to their fore. Resistance by the Uttar Pradesh police (-an organised net work of criminals of all shades as per UP high court) and the paramilitary forces was nothing more than an eye wash. No one ever imagined the gathering of such a large volume of volunteers-even the secularists. In the milieu (-environment, background, backdrop, setting, context, atmosphere, scene) resulting in a pitched battle several innocent Kar Sewaks were killed. V.P. Singh became a tool in the hands of so called secularists in Janta Party and fall of his government became imminent resulting in fresh elections. The BJP won a majority in the Uttar Pradesh legislative assembly increased its share of seats in the Lok Sabha.
In can not be denied that on 6 December 1992, the VHP and its associates, including the BJP, organised a rally involving 1,50,000 VHP and BJP Kar Sewaks at the site of the Ram Lala Janm Bhumi. The ceremonies included speeches by the BJP leaders such as Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and Uma Bharti. None of the speeches were reported to be instigative or provocative. The mob grew became uncontrolled and the inevitable happened. A police cordon placed there to protect the site was heavily outnumbered.  No tools or instruments were present at the site even after crumbling  of the site. This occurred despite a commitment from the state government to the Indian Supreme Court that the site would not be harmed. More than 2000 people were killed in the riots following the demolition. Riots broke out in many major Indian cities including Mumbai, Delhi and Hyderabad instigated by the opposition parties and Muslim communalists & the criminals.
The Government of India appointed the Libertarian Commission to probe the circumstances that led to the demolition of the Babri Mosque, on 16 December 1992. It was the longest running commission in Indian history with several extensions granted by various governments. The report found a number of people culpable in the demolition, including BJP leaders like Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Lal Krashn Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, then Uttar Pradesh chief minister Kalyan Singh, Pramod Mahajan, Uma Bharti and Vijay Raje Scindia, as well as VHP leaders like Giri Raj Kishore and Ashok Singhal. Other prominent political leaders indicted by the commission include late Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray and former RSS leader K. Govinda Chary. Relying on the testimonies of several eyewitnesses, the report stated that many of these leaders had made provocative speeches at the rally that provoked the demolition. It also stated that they could have stopped the demolition if they had so wished. The outcome is grossly against facts and figures. The motivated witnesses deserve to be cross questioned-examined in the court of law. The commission of inquiry acted upon the behest of consequent governments and it was neither impartial not fare. Each & every effort was made to implicate Adwani & Kalyan Singh. However the benefit went to BJP which could easily strengthen its position in the hearts of Indian masses.
Many Muslim organisations have continued to express outrage at the destruction of the disputed structure. In July 2005, terrorists attacked the makeshift temple at the site of the destroyed mosque. In 2007, M. N. Gopal Das, the then head of the Ram temple, received phone calls making threats against his life. Many terror attacks by banned Jihadi outfits like Indian Mujaheddin cited demolition of Babri Mosque as an excuse for terrorist attacks.The Muslims live in India but patronize-favor Pakistan. Its only in India that a Muslim can live freely and flourish, in spite of his anti national approach. The legal case continues regarding the title deed of the land tract which is a government controlled property. The lawyers representing the case have become multimillionaires but Ram Lala still reside under make shift tarpaulin shelter at his own abode.


MAHANT RAM DAS CASE :: In 1885, Mahant Raghubar Ram moved the courts for permission to erect a temple just outside the Mosque premises. Despite validating the claim of the petitioner, the Faizabad District Judge dismissed the case, citing the passage of time. On 18 March 1886, the judge passed an order in which he wrote: "I visited the land in dispute yesterday in the presence of all parties. I found that the Masjid built by Emperor Babar stands on the border of Ayodhya, that is to say, to the west and south it is clear of habitations. It is most unfortunate that a Masjid should have been built on land specially held sacred by the Hindus, but as that event occurred 356 years ago, it is too late now to agree with the grievances." [Court verdict by Col. F.E.A. Chamier, District Judge, Faizabad (1886)]
Several later mosques were built in Faizabad district, in which the pilgrim city of Ayodhya falls. Ayodhya itself has a small Muslim population, though there are substantial numbers of Muslims 7 km away at District Headquarters-Faizabad. Since 1949, by Indian Government order, Muslims were not permitted to be closer than 200 yards away to the site; the main gate remained locked, though Hindu pilgrims were allowed to enter through a side door. The 1986 Allahabad High Court ordered the opening of the main gate and restored the site in full to the Hindus. Hindu groups later requested modifications to the Babri Mosque and drew up plans for a new grand Temple with Government permissions; riots between Hindu and Muslim groups took place as a result. Since then, the matter is sub-judice and this political, historical and socio-religious debate over the history and location of the Babri Mosque, is known as the Ayodhya dispute.
EXCAVATIONS :: Archaeological excavations by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in 1970, 1992 and 2003 in and around the disputed site have clearly found the evidence indicating that a large Hindu complex existed on the site. In 2003, by the order of an Indian Court, The Archaeological Survey of India was asked to conduct a more in depth study and an excavation to ascertain the type of structure that was beneath the rubble indicated definite proof of a temple under the mosque. However, it could not be ascertained if it was a Rama temple as remnant had more resemblance to a Bhagwan Shiv temple. In the words of ASI researchers, they discovered "distinctive features associated with temples of north India".
Excavations further yielded: "Stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of a divine couple and carved architectural features, including foliage patterns, amalak (-अमालक), kapotpali (-कपोत पाली), doorjamb with semi-circular shrine pilaster, broke octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having Pran Jal (-प्राण जल, watershute) in the north and 50 pillar bases in association with a huge structure."
Papers published by inspired writers like Ram Saran, Suraj Bhan, Athar Aki, Dwijendra Narayan Jha in the grab of historians perhaps did not study the scriptures, epics, Veds, Purans, history carried forward from ages. They just acted as tools in their self interest to propagate the gains of the political party in power and to appease the Muslims for their votes. Ayodhya is a Puri, the status of which is much higher to a pilgrimage site.
In 1950, Gopal Singh Visharad filed a title suit with the Allahabad High Court seeking injunction to offer 'puja' (worship) at the disputed site. A similar suit was filed shortly after but later withdrawn by Param Hans Das of Ayodhya. In 1959, the Nirmohi Akhara, a Hindu religious institution, filed a third title suit seeking direction to hand over the charge of the disputed site, claiming to be its custodian. A fourth suit was filed by the Muslim Central Board of Wakf for declaration and possession of the site. The Allahabad high court bench began hearing the case in 2002, which was completed in 2010. However, the bench withheld its verdict till 24 September. After the Supreme Court dismissed a plea to defer the High Court verdict, the High Court set 30 September 2010 as the final date for pronouncing the judgement.
On 30 September 2010, the High Court of Allahabad, the three-member bench comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Aggarwal and D. V. Sharma, ruled that the disputed land be split into three parts. The site of the Ram Lala idol would go to the party representing Ram Lalla Virajman (the installed Infant Ram deity), Nirmohi Akhara to get Sita Rasoi and Ram Chabutara-platform and the Sunni Wakf Board to get the rest. The court also ruled that the status quo should be maintained for three months.


Reacting to the verdict, all the three parties announced that they would appeal against the division of disputed land in the Supreme Court of India. All the three parties, however, conceded that this judgment was an important step towards the resolution of a long-standing dispute. Subramanian Swamy a BJP stalwart has now filed suit in the Hon. Supreme Court of India to hear & settle the case expeditiously.
मन्दिर के भग्नावेशों में 14 स्तंभ मिले हैं। सभी स्तंभों पर कलश खुदे हैं। ये 11 वीं व 12 वीं शताब्दी के मंदिरों में पाए जानेवाले कलश के समान हैं। कलश ऐसे नौ प्रतीकों में एक हैं, जो मंदिर में होते हैं। इस से कुछ मात्रा में यह भी स्पष्ट हो गया था कि, लगभग 60-70 साल पहले बना मस्जिद का कमजोर ढाँचा एक मंदिर के अवशेष पर खड़ा था। आज की भाषा में यह मुसलमानों द्वारा हिन्दुओं के तीर्थस्थल में अतिक्रमण-घुसपैंठ का मामला है। मन्दिर की आधार शिला और शिल्प, वास्तु पूर्ण रूप से हिंदु भारतीय परम्परा के अनुसार है। 
TIME LINE
YEAR
DATE
EVENT
1527
During the reign of Babar, the first Mughal emperor, some have claimed an old Hindu temple was demolished and a mosque constructed at the same place in Ayodhya and named after Babar.
1853
The first recorded communal clashes over the site date to this year.
1859
The colonial British administration put a fence around the site, denominating separate areas of worship for Hindus and Muslims. That is how it stood for about 90 years.
1949
December
Idols were placed inside the mosque. Both sides to the dispute filed civil suits. The government locked the gates, saying the matter was sub judice and declared the area disputed. The civil suits were filed for ownership of the Plot no 583 of the area.
1961
Case filed in Indian courts against forceful occupation of the Babri Mosque and placing of idols within it.
1984
The movement to build a temple at the site, which Hindus claimed was the birthplace of Lord Ram, gathered momentum when Hindu groups formed a committee to spearhead the construction of a temple at the Ram Janm Bhoomi site.
1986
A district judge ordered the gates of the mosque to be opened after almost five decades and allowed Hindus to worship inside the “disputed structure.” A Babri Mosque Action Committee was formed as Muslims protested the move to allow Hindu prayers at the site. The gates were opened in less than an hour after the court decision.
1989
The clamor for building a Ram temple was growing. In February, VHP proclaimed that a Shila or a stone will be established for construction of temple near the area. In November, the Vishw Hindu Parishad laid foundations of a temple on land adjacent to the "disputed structure" in presence of Home Minister Boota Singh and then Chief Minister N. D. Tiwari. There were sporadic clashes in the country such as Bhagal Pur in Bihar.
1990
V P Singh became the Prime Minister of India with support of BJP which had won 58 seats in the election, a massive improvement from its last tally of 2 seats. The then BJP president Lal Krishna Advani took out a cross-country Rath Yatra to garner support for the move to build a Ram temple at the site. On 23 October was arrested in Bihar during the Yatra, following which BJP took back its support to the government. Sh Chandra Shekhar became the Prime Minister of India with support of the congress. On October 30, many were gunned down by the police on orders of the then Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mulayam Singh Yadav, when they gathered in Ayodhya as participants of the Rath-Yatra; their bodies were thrown in the river Saryu.
1991
Congress came to power at center after elections in 1991, while BJP became major opposition party in center and came to power in many states such as Madhy Pradesh, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Kalyan Singh became the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh. State government acquired 2.77 acre land in the area and gave it on lease to Ram Janm Bhoomi Nyas Trust. The Allahabad High Court stopped any permanent construction activity in the area. Kalyan Singh publicly supported the movement while Central Government took no action to curb the increasing tensions. In spite of the High Court judgement, disputed area was leveled.
1992
Kalyan Singh took steps to support the movement such as making entry into area easier, promising no firing on Kar Sewaks, opposing decision of central government to send Central Police force in the area, etc. In July, several thousand Kar Sewaks assembled in the area and the work for maintenance of temple started. This activity was stopped after intervention of the prime minister. Meetings started between Babri Masjid Action Committee and VHP leaders in presence of the home minister. On 30 October, Dharam Sansad of VHP proclaimed in Delhi that the talks have failed and Kar Sewa will presume from 6 December. Central Government was considering the deployment of central police forces in the area and dissolution of state government but in the end decided against it. The case was being heard in the Supreme Court which told that State Government is responsible for ensuring law and order in the area. The government was discussing it in Cabinet Committee meeting and Rashtriy Ekta Parishad. BJP boycotted the Parishad. The Allahabad High Court was hearing the matter of legality of structure of foundation laid in 1989.
1992
6 December
The Babri Mosque was demolished by a gathering of near 200,000 Karsevaks. Communal riots across India followed.
1992
16 December
Ten days after the demolition, the Congress government at the Center, headed by P. V. Narasimha Rao, set up a commission of inquiry under Justice Liberhan.
1993
Three months after being constituted, the Liberhan Commission began investigations into who and what led to the demolition of the Babri Mosque.
2001
Tensions rose on the anniversary of the demolition of the mosque as the VHP reaffirmed its resolve to build a temple at the site.
2002
27 February
At least 58 people were killed in Godhra, Gujarat, in an attack on a train believed to be carrying Hindu volunteers from Ayodhya. Riots followed in the state and over 2000 people were unofficially reported to have died in these.
2003
The court ordered a survey to find out whether a temple to Lord Ram existed on the site. In August, the survey presented evidence of a temple under the mosque. Muslim groups disputed the findings.
2003
September
A court ruled that seven Hindu leaders, including some prominent BJP leaders, should stand trial for inciting the destruction of the Babri Mosque.
2004
November
An Uttar Pradesh court ruled that an earlier order which exonerated LK Advani for his role in the destruction of the mosque should be reviewed.
2007
The Supreme Court refused to admit a review petition on the Ayodhya dispute.
2009
The Liberhan Commission, which was instituted ten days after the demolition of the Babri Mosque in 1992, submitted its report on 30 June — almost 17 years after it began its inquiry. Its contents were not made public.
2010
30 
September
The Allahabad High Court pronounces its verdict on four title suits relating to the Ayodhya dispute on 30 September 2010. Ayodhya land to be divided into three parts. 1/3 goes to Ram Lalla represented by Hindu Maha Sabha, 1/3 to Sunni Wakf Board, 1/3 goes to Nirmohi Akhara.
2010
December
The Akhil Bhartiy Hindu Maha Sabha and Sunni Waqf Board moved to the Supreme Court of India, challenging part of the Allahabad High Court’s verdict.
2011
9 May
Supreme Court of India stayed the high court order splitting the disputed site in three parts and said that status quo will remain. The two judge bench of Supreme Court remarked that the High Court verdict was surprising as no party wanted a split of the site.


No comments:

Post a Comment